Skip to content
IndexesFor DMOs & tourism boardsAboutContact

Destination Source Control · Edition 1, 2027 travel year

What AI cites about Austria

Austria's own official sites supply 0.0% of the sources AI cites for it; official sites of any kind, including other tourism boards and government sites, supply 16.7%. It is not ranked: a ranking needs at least 50 citations from 15 answers with web search on. Based on 33 citations in 32 answers with web search on.

This destination in the other indexes: AI Shortlist

Who gets cited

Share of citations from each kind of source, averaged so each platform counts equally.

Unit: share of citations
Tourism boardsGovernmentEditorialNewsForumsBlogsBooking sitesSocial mediaSearch, maps and reviewsReferenceWeather and flight toolsTravel companiesUnclassified
Austria0.0%16.7%3.3%10.6%0.0%10.5%1.1%0.0%8.3%1.6%0.0%25.9%22.1%

By platform

PlatformSources recorded asControlCitations
Claudelinks the model wrote0.0%27
ChatGPTlinks the model wrote0.0%2
Geminisources from the search tooln/a0
Groksources from the search tool0.0%4

Most cited sites

SiteKind of sourceCitationsOfficial
moonhoneytravel.comBlogs4
news.aa.comTravel companies3
euronews.comEditorial2
forbes.comNews2
myglobalviewpoint.comBlogs2
aviationa2z.comUnclassified1
backroads.comTravel companies1
crowddodger.comUnclassified1
en.wikipedia.orgReference1
familycantravel.comBlogs1
hallstatt.netUnclassified1
hello-salzburg.atUnclassified1

Austria

Most questions went to each model at each setting only once, and a model read the answers, so a reading can be wrong. The methodology has the details.

Loading mentions…

Request a destination scan

One destinationReal travel questionsSources you can inspect