Skip to content
IndexesFor DMOs & tourism boardsAboutContact

Destination Source Control · Edition 1, 2027 travel year

What AI cites about Serbia

Serbia's own official sites supply 0.0% of the sources AI cites for it; official sites of any kind, including other tourism boards and government sites, supply 15.3%. It is not ranked: a ranking needs at least 50 citations from 15 answers with web search on. Based on 44 citations in 44 answers with web search on.

This destination in the other indexes: AI Shortlist

Who gets cited

Share of citations from each kind of source, averaged so each platform counts equally.

Unit: share of citations
Tourism boardsGovernmentEditorialNewsForumsBlogsBooking sitesSocial mediaSearch, maps and reviewsReferenceWeather and flight toolsTravel companiesUnclassified
Serbia1.6%13.8%2.1%0.0%0.0%3.7%0.0%0.0%27.4%16.5%0.0%10.7%24.3%

By platform

PlatformSources recorded asControlCitations
Claudelinks the model wrote0.0%17
ChatGPTlinks the model wrote0.0%13
Geminisources from the search tool0.0%2
Groksources from the search tool0.0%12

Most cited sites

SiteKind of sourceCitationsOfficial
en.wikipedia.orgReference10
srbija.gov.rsGovernment7
expobelgrade2027.orgUnclassified6
blog.wego.comBlogs4
tripprof.comSearch, maps and reviews4
bie-paris.orgUnclassified3
rebellionresearch.comUnclassified3
fantravel.comTravel companies2
beinbelgrade.comUnclassified1
breakingtravelnews.comEditorial1
odysseys-unlimited.comTravel companies1
realclearworld.comUnclassified1

Serbia

Most questions went to each model at each setting only once, and a model read the answers, so a reading can be wrong. The methodology has the details.

Loading mentions…

Request a destination scan

One destinationReal travel questionsSources you can inspect